CO129-261 - Public Offices & Others - 1893 — Page 337

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

No.

843.

In any further correspondence on this subject, the above number should be quoted,

and

the communication should be addressed to

"The Comptroller and Auditor General,”

Gov

73441

Sir,

EXCHEQUER AND AUDIT DEPARTMENT,

SOMERSET HOUSE,

LONDON, W.C. 2

15th September 1893

[Received 12 SEP 93]

I am directed by the Comptroller and Auditor General to acknowledge the receipt of your letter of the 10th ultimo, transmitting for consideration a despatch from the Governor of Hong Kong, dated 1st July 1893, with reference to the revised system of accounting for Works Expenditure in that Colony.

and

The Director of Public Works, in his minute of 26th June 1893, a copy of which was forwarded by Sir Wm Robinson, takes exception to the adoption of the Sub Head "Wages" in addition to the two Sub Heads "Materials" and "Contract Work" as proposed in Paragraph 3 of the letter from this Department to the Local Auditor of 19th May last.

I am however to point out that the paragraph in question, whilst explaining what is considered to be the more correct course to follow, expressly stated that the adoption of three Sub Heads, instead of two only as proposed, was "not a sine quâ non".

In view of this reservation, and also of the objections raised by the Director of Public Works, which are supported by the Governor, Sir Charles Ryan is not disposed to press for the adoption of what would, in the case of greater departmental expenditure on labour than at present exists at Hong Kong, be, in his opinion, not merely more correct, but an essential method of accounting.

The Hon. R.H.Meade C.B.,

Colonial Office.

The Governor's despatch is herewith returned.

I have the honour to be,

Sir,

Your obedient Servant,

Arthur L. Vesey

Edit History

2026-05-27 07:57:50 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
No. 843. In any further correspondence on this subject, the above number should be quoted, and the communication should be addressed to "The Comptroller and Auditor General,” Gov 73441 Sir, EXCHEQUER AND AUDIT DEPARTMENT, SOMERSET HOUSE, LONDON, W.C. 2 15th September 1893 [Received 12 SEP 93] I am directed by the Comptroller and Auditor General to acknowledge the receipt of your letter of the 10th ultimo, transmitting for consideration a despatch from the Governor of Hong Kong, dated 1st July 1893, with reference to the revised system of accounting for Works Expenditure in that Colony. and The Director of Public Works, in his minute of 26th June 1893, a copy of which was forwarded by Sir Wm Robinson, takes exception to the adoption of the Sub Head "Wages" in addition to the two Sub Heads "Materials" and "Contract Work" as proposed in Paragraph 3 of the letter from this Department to the Local Auditor of 19th May last. I am however to point out that the paragraph in question, whilst explaining what is considered to be the more correct course to follow, expressly stated that the adoption of three Sub Heads, instead of two only as proposed, was "not a sine quâ non". In view of this reservation, and also of the objections raised by the Director of Public Works, which are supported by the Governor, Sir Charles Ryan is not disposed to press for the adoption of what would, in the case of greater departmental expenditure on labour than at present exists at Hong Kong, be, in his opinion, not merely more correct, but an essential method of accounting. The Hon. R.H.Meade C.B., Colonial Office. The Governor's despatch is herewith returned. I have the honour to be, Sir, Your obedient Servant, Arthur L. Vesey
Baseline (Original)
No. 843. In any further correspondence on this subject, the above number should be quoted, and the communication should be addressed to "The Comptroller and Auditor General,” Gov 73441 Sir, EXCHEQUER AND AUDIT DEPARTMENT, boten SOMERSET HOUSE, LONDON, W.C. 335 Septembe 15611 Rece Ren 12 SEP 33] I am directed by the Comptroller and Auditor General to acknowledge the receipt of your letter of the 10th ultimo, transmitting for consideration a despatch from the Governor of Hong Kong, dated 1st July 1893, with reference to the revised system of accounting for Works Expenditure in that Colony. and The Director of Public Works, in his minute of 26th June 1893, a copy of which was forwarded by Sir Wm Robinson, takes exception to the adoption of the Sub Head "Wages" in addition to the two Sub Heads "Materials "Contract Work" as proposed in Paragraph 3 of the letter from this Department to the Local Auditor of 19th May last. I am however to point out that the paragraph in question, whilst explaining what is considered to be the more correct course to follow, expressly stated that the adoption of three Sub Heads, instead of two only as proposa was "not a sine quâ non". In view of this reservation, and also of the objections raised by the Director of Public Works, which are supported by the Governor, Sir Charles Ryan is not disposed to press for the adoption of what would, in the case of greater departmental expenditure on labour than at the more correct, present exists at Hong Kong, be, in his opinion, not merely but an essential method of accounting. e Hon. R.H.Meade C.B., Colonial Office. The Governor's despatch is herewith returned. I have the honour to be, Sir, Your obedient Servant, Arthur L. Vesey
2026-05-27 07:57:50 · Baseline
View content

No.

843.

In any further correspondence on this subject, the above number should be quoted,

and

the communication should be addressed to

"The Comptroller and Auditor General,”

Gov

73441

Sir,

EXCHEQUER AND AUDIT DEPARTMENT,

boten

SOMERSET HOUSE,

LONDON, W.C. 335

Septembe

15611

Rece Ren 12 SEP 33]

I am directed by the Comptroller and Auditor General to acknowledge the receipt of your letter of the 10th ultimo, transmitting for consideration a despatch from the Governor of Hong Kong, dated 1st July 1893, with reference to the revised system of accounting for Works Expenditure in that Colony.

and

The Director of Public Works, in his minute of 26th June 1893, a copy of which was forwarded by Sir Wm Robinson, takes exception to the adoption of the Sub Head "Wages" in addition to the two Sub Heads "Materials "Contract Work" as proposed in Paragraph 3 of the letter from this Department to the Local Auditor of 19th May last.

I am however to point out that the paragraph in question, whilst explaining what is considered to be the more correct course to follow, expressly stated that the adoption of three Sub Heads, instead of two only as proposa was "not a sine quâ non".

In view of this reservation, and also of the

objections raised by the Director of Public Works, which

are supported by the Governor, Sir Charles Ryan is not

disposed to press for the adoption of what would, in the

case of greater departmental expenditure on labour than at the more correct, present exists at Hong Kong, be, in his opinion, not merely

but an essential method of accounting.

e Hon. R.H.Meade C.B.,

Colonial Office.

The Governor's despatch is herewith returned.

I have the honour to be,

Sir,

Your obedient Servant,

Arthur L. Vesey

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.